I express myself now pointedly on issues of which all think I had no idea (except sports, of which I have no idea where that is;). Let's start on a political issue, because I was busy and since my blog is read by committed social critics who may be interested in the concerns or.
I know it is not - or not - particularly current, but I still want something on the selection logic the German and non-voters say. They can really only be uninformed. We have a variety Party in Germany, is the envy of people in other states would. One has not to any point of the platform match (but of course, already a majority, "for I the CDU have selected, so Turkey is not in the EU comes", argh ...): I am against a women's quota, and would still the Left choose, because people say "well, that You can not choose." If the views are the poll numbers? Most Germans are, for example against the Bundeswehr mission in Afghanistan (70%) , for minimum wage (80% ; the Manager course not, so choose which was also CDU and FDP , however, are apparently 81% of CDU voters for what again shows how illogical the Germans behave in elections), for the nuclear phase , against genetic engineering (78%) and against the easing of employment protection (82%) . Let us stick to these five items, alone there are already nine persons, representing the: Left, NPD, MLPD, PBC, Welfare Party, Family Party, ADM, DKP and the Pensioners Party.
The MLPD distances itself not a Stalinism Maoism or , moreover, they are obviously for a violent revolution , so falling out. The fact that the NPD is not an alternative, we are hopefully agree. The PBC course you can not take it seriously ... of course they consider homosexuality need therapy are against divorce and abortion , request a prohibition of pornography and occultism , sympathize with Israel because they are against nationalism and racism (well, and because they are God's chosen people) etc. - please, not yet capable of governing.
The Family Party has unfortunately a very narrow (but in my opinion otherwise useful) program that would have to - apart from the fact that small parties have little chance to get over the five-percent hurdle - form a coalition with another party. Similar to the Animal Welfare Party, which I personally find well established by the German chooses not because he thinks, because of environmental priorities for crazy green moth. From the ADM I honestly do not quite smart, I would have to sit down with the more intensively. Since the DKP communism pursued as a goal (right communism, which have also noticed that the GDR and the Soviet Union were not appropriate ...), this never even works and has probably work in reality never will, they have no viable alternative. And the Pensioners Party has called for a government with just a narrow range.
If only one party: "The Left" - "Uargh.! Say it again. "-" The Left. "-"! Uargh "... Most Germans find the program useful, but it is only chosen by 14%. This really means nothing more than that 86% percent of German voters either do not or choose a party that represents the opposite of what they think is right. As people say, for example, that was the SED's successor party, which could you can not choose. As is borne in mind that in the party are also many old Social Democrats, who left the SPD because they did not hold for social justice. The SPD wants to not coalesce with the. The only form a coalition with the CDU, which may fail to implement but their election program. (Who does not know. at times give Google 'Verräterpartei' a) Why choose the people at all.
As for the observation by the constitutional protection, which is a non sense to me. The left apart from the above-mentioned call for a quota for women a meaningful choice program. People ask how to finance the "priceless" goals. Since is then made reference to conservative newspapers, which are biased as the Axel Springer-Verlag . The answer is still obvious: wealth tax. Oskar Lafointaine for example - I know who has resigned, but the following is also true of others in the party - himself lives in a huge mansion, but still calls the taxation of wealth . Moreover, the left as mentioned against the mission in Afghanistan . The German defense expenditures were last year at 47 466 billion U.S. dollars . Much of it fell away and could be invested for example in education or pensions.
is basically in Germany unfounded and completely against the Left Party seized. "These left-spinner, who only want the Wall back" - to the MLPD that perhaps true, the Left Party distances itself from these views, however . Additionally, those who think a closer, will realize quickly that the Wall and the GDR were not left, that had to do everything to do with human rights or justice. I've targeted this misinformation recently at school noticed, our history is actually very knowledgeable teacher who also teaches politics, claimed that the Left put the constitution and democracy in question . He also cited the example of the Left itself is contrary to the Election posters "wealth tax" and "work has to return 'worth, although he would be aware that the latter is from the FDP and the Left. Please be 'work, it pays " is just as engaging as" multi-net from the gross "and" Those who work must have more than one who does not work "...
In this sense, people go, . choose Maybe not the left, but at least a party that represents what you think is right . The only ones who benefit from your "protest" that is, are all these Wester Welles, Ronald Koch and the Conservatives, So those who are now in power. This harms Germany, you see this very clearly. (I Go refer to this point to cold mirrors video "vote or die!" , which expresses what I just wrote, the more enjoyable way.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment